Crop Genebank Knowledge Base

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Bacteria - forage legume

Contributors to this page are: CIAT, Colombia (Maritza Cuervo, Cesar Medina, Jose Luis Ramirez, Socorro Balcazar, Josefina Martinez, Daniel Debouck); ILRI, Ethiopia (Jean Hanson, Janice Proud, Juvy Cantrell); ICARDA, Syria (Siham Asaad).

Contents:
Common blight, fuscous blight (English)
Halo Blight
Bacterial blight, Bacterial Pod Rot
Bacterial wilt of beans

Common blight, fuscous blight (English)

 Common blight, fuscous blight (photo: http://photos.eppo.org/index.php/image/
975-xantph-01/hits/88-xanthomonas-axonopodis-pv-phaseoli-xantph-)

Scientific names

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli (Smith) Vauterin et al

Other scientific names

Xanthomonas campestris pv. Phaseoli (Smith) Dye Xanthomonas phaseoli var. fuscans (Burkholder) Starr & Burkholder

Significance

Important (spread and loss of yields).

Symptoms

On leaves: initially small water soaked lesions develop narrow, yellow halos. Lesions may enlarge and coalesce, causing extensive necrosis. Lesions may also occur on stems and pods. Infected seeds are sometimes wrinkled and the hilum may be discoloured. Symptoms similar to halo-blight of bean.

On seed: If the infection occurred when the pods were young, the seed may rot or be variously wrinkled and shrivelled. If the bacteria enter by way of the funiculus, only the hilum may be discoloured, but this is difficult to detect on dark-seeded varieties. Strains producing the brown pigment (so-called fuscans strains) give more conspicuous seed discoloration.

Hosts

The principal host is Phaseolus vulgaris and Phaseolus lunatus but other legume species are naturally infected, including P. lunatus, Vigna aconitifolia, V. radiata, and Vigna umbellate. Lablab purpureus and Mucuna deeringiana are possibly natural hosts. P. coccineus, P. acutifolius and Lupinus polyphyllus are hosts only by artificial inoculation (Bradbury, 1986). Macroptilium lathyroides.

Geographic distribution

EPPO region: Found in Egypt, Finland (unconfirmed), Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco (unconfirmed), Norway, Poland (unconfirmed), Sweden (unconfirmed). Widespread in Bulgaria, Hungary, Lebanon and Spain; locally established in France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal (Madeira), Romania, Russia (European), Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey and Yugoslavia. Found in the past but not established in the Czech Republic, Israel.

Asia: Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China (Heilongjiang, Henan, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Zhejiang), Cyprus, Georgia, Hong Kong, India (Delhi, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Korea Democratic People's Republic, Korea Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates (IMI, 1996), Viet Nam, Yemen.

Africa: Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda, Zaire, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

North America: Bermuda, Canada (Ontario), Mexico, USA (more prevalent east of the Rocky Mountains: Colorado, Hawaii, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New York, Texas, Wisconsin, Wyoming).

Central America and Caribbean: Widespread in Central America; Barbados, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico, St. Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago.

South America: Argentina, Brazil (widespread), Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela.

Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia), New Zealand, Samoa.

EU: Present.

VeryVery widespread (Anonymous, 1971).

Biology and transmission

The bacterium enters the leaves via stomata or wounds, and subsequently invades the intercellular spaces, causing a gradual dissolution of the middle lamella. The stem is entered in three ways: via the stomata of the hypocotyl and epicotyl; through the vascular system of the leaf; or from infected cotyledons. The seed is penetrated via the vascular system of the pedicel and funiculus. The micropyle also serves as a point of entry into the seed. Direct penetration of seed has not been observed. The pathogen either remains in the seedcoat or passes to the cotyledons when the seed germinates, and so infection of the young plant results.

The bacterium can remain viable for several years beneath the seedcoat.

The disease is severe under conditions of high rainfall and humidity, with maximum development around 28°C. Dissemination in the field occurs in wind-driven rain, and insects.

Detection/indexing method

  • At CIAT: Agar plate dilution technique. MXP (Claflin et al 1987) and YDCA semiselective culture medium and serology.

Treatment/control

  • Procedure followed in case of positive test

References of protocols at EPPO, NAPPO or other similar organization

OEPP/EPPO Data sheets on quarantine organisms. Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003

References and further reading

Anonymous. 1971. CMI distribution maps of plant diseases. No. 401 (edition 2).
Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.

Bradbury JF. (1986) Guide to plant pathogenic bacteria. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

Claflin LE, Vidaver AK, Sasser M. (1987) MXP, a semiselective medium for Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli. Phytopathology 77, 730-734.

Frison EA, Bos L, Hamilton RI, Mathur SB, Taylor JD. (eds.). 1990. FAO/IBPGR Technical Guidelines for the Safe Movement of Legume Germplasm. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome/International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Back to top


Halo Blight

Photo by Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org

Scientific names

Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola

Other scientific names

Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. phaseolicola

Significance

Important (spread and loss of yields).

Symptoms

Symptoms first appear as dark, water-soaked leaf spots, up to 3 mm in diameter and sometimes surrounded by a broad lemon-coloured halo. No lesions have been observed on stems or leaf stalks. When these pathogenic bacteria enter the leaves through wounds or natural openings like stomates they multiply rapidly and induce the formation of lesions. The lesions, which are watersoaked at first, soon become brown and dry and are usually surrounded by a yellow halo. When many lesions grow together, large areas of dead leaf tissue may develop. The halo is actually caused by a toxin that is produced by the bacteria within the lesion. As the toxin diffuses out into the leaf tissue it causes breakdown of chlorophyll and creates the halo. When toxin from infected leaves is translocated to the growing point of the shoot, the new leaves that develop are often stunted and chlorotic.

Hosts

Cajanus cajan, Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium spp., Phaseolus coccineus, P. lunatus, P.vulgaris, Pueraria spp., Vigna angularis, V. radiata, Neonotonia wightii. Isolates of the pathovar are categorised into three races on the basis of the reactions of a range of differential bean cultivars.

Geographic distribution

Worldwide (Anonymous, 1973). In temperate climatic conditions and in the tropics at medium to high altitudes (1000-2500 m). Race 3 of the pathogen has been found only in East and Central Africa.

Biology and transmission

Cell of the pathogen are single, straight rods and move by multitrichous polar flagellar. They are Gram-negative and strictly aerobic. The optimal growth temperature is 20 - 23o and on agar the bacterium produces white to cream coloured colonies wich exhibit a bluish tinge and often a green fluorescent pigment. P. syringae pv. phaseolicola survives in infected seeds and in vegetable(plant) residues in the surface of the soil until the environmental conditions are propitious for the development of the infection.

Detection/indexing method

  • At CIAT: Agar plate dilution technique. King B semiselective culture medium and serology.

Treatment/control

  • Procedure followed in case of positive test

References and further reading

Frison EA, Bos L, Hamilton RI, Mathur SB, Taylor JD. (eds.). 1990. FAO/IBPGR Technical Guidelines for the Safe Movement of Legume Germplasm. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome/International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Lenné JM, Trutman P. 1990. Diseases of Tropical Pasture Plants. CAB Interantional in association with Natural Resource Institute and CIAT.

Lascano CE, Spain JM. Establecimiy Renovación de Pasturas. Red Interacional de Evaluación de Pastos Tropicales. Veracruz, Mexico 1988

Schwartz HF. 1989. Halo blight In: Schwartz, H.F. and Pastor Corrales, M.A. Bean Production Problems in the tropics. CIAT. Cali, Colombia, pp 285-302

Taylor JD. 1970. The quantitative estimation of the infection of bean seed with Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burkh.) Dowson. Ann appl. Biol. 66: 29-36. 

Back to top


Bacterial blight, Bacterial Pod Rot

Scientific names

Pseudomonas fluorescens biotipo II Migula

Other scientific names

Bacillus fluorescens Trevisan 1889
Bacterium fluorescens (Trevisan 1889) Lehmann and Neumann 1896
Liquidomonas fluorescens (Trevisan 1889) Orla-Jensen 1909
Bacillus fluorescens Flgge 1886

Symptoms

The disease is characterizates by water-soaked lesions on young growth especially young leaves, petioles and terminals, progressing to bliht, necrosis, dieback and defoliation. Necroticspots develop on older leaves and flowering and seed productions may be severely reduced.

Hosts

Centrosema sp. (C. acutifolium, C. pubescens, C. brasilianum, C. macrocarpum, C. schiedeanum and C. virginianum), Allium, Brassica, Phaseolus sp., Solanum spp., Leucaena leucocephala.

Geographic distribution

Colombia and Costa Rica.

Biology and transmission

Although the species is normally considered to be a saprophyte, Biotipe II causes root rots and leaf blights on a range of hostd, including legumes. It is distinguished from other fluorescent pseudomonas by the following characterisitic: more than one polar flagellum, no poyocyanin or carotenoid pigments produced, no growth at 41o C, gelatin hydrolysed but not starch and utilization of a wide range of carbon sources. Disease is favoured by high relative humidity and moderately high temperatures. The bacterium can survive unfavourable periods on affected plants and soil for as long as 6 weeks. The bacterium is seed-borne and levels of infections as high as 32 % have been found in seed lots of C. acutifolium.

Detection/indexing method

  • At CIAT: Agar plate dilution technique. King B semiselective culture medium.

Treatment/control

  • Procedure followed in case of positive test

References and further reading

Arias B, Lenne JM. 1988. Sistemas de produccion de Pasturas Tropicales de semillas de Centrosema acutifolium y efecto de bacterioocidas en la incidencia de Pseudomonas fluorescens Biotipo II. Pasturas Tropicales Vol. 10, 11-18.

Bradbury JF. 1986. Guide to plant pathogenic Bacteria, CAB Interantional, Wallingford, UK

Guevara Gómez CL, Lenné JM, Torres GC. 1983. Etiology of dieback of Centrosema spp. and effect of the pathogen on yield and quality during the period of establishment of the legume. Phytopathology 73, 122

Lenné JM, Torres GC, Victoria JI. 1981. Bacterial leaf spot and dieback of Centrosema spp. Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Plant Path. Bact Cali, 35-38.

Back to top


Bacterial wilt of beans

Scientific names

Curtobacterium flaccumfasciens pv. flaccumfaciens (Hedges) Collins & Jones

Other names

Bacterial wilt (Phaseolus beans), bacterial tan spot (soyabeans)

Symptoms

Seedlings are stunted, wilted and usually die. In some plants the affected parts are dull green in colour and sometimes breaking of the stems. Infected pods show discoloured sutures and may show yellowish areas.

Foliar interveinal chlorosis and necrosis. When the lower stem and root are cut longitudinally and observed, the vascular system is often discolored brown to black. The younger the plant becomes infected, the more severe the damage to the plant. Seedlings are frequently severely stunted or killed. If plants survive to maturity, seeds may show yellow or purple discoloration.

Seeds of white-seeded cultivars, when infected systemically, are bright-yellow; in cultivars with coloured seed coats, the coloration is less conspicuous. There may be a little yellow slime at the hilum, and seeds may be variously shrivelled. The colour mutants, aurantiacum and violaceum, produce an orange and purple discoloration, respectively, in the seedcoat.

Hosts

Lablab purpureus, Phaseolus coccineus, Phaseolus lunatus, Phaseolus vulgaris, Vigna angularis, Vigna unguiculata, Zornia spp. and possibly Glycine max.
All members of Leguminosae.

Geographic distribution

Bacterial wilt of beans has been reported in North and South America, Europe, and Australia

EPPO region: Recorded in Albania, Ukraine. Found but not established in Greece and Hungary; locally established in Bulgaria (unconfirmed), Romania, Tunisia, Turkey (unconfirmed), Russia (Far East, Southern Russia; only on soyabean) and Yugoslavia. Reports from Belgium (OEPP/EPPO, 1982), France, Germany and Switzerland have not been substantiated.

Asia: Russia (Far East), Turkey (unconfirmed).

Africa: Mauritius, Tunisia.

North America: Canada (Ontario), Mexico (unconfirmed), USA (first reported in 1920, especially in irrigated high plains and Midwest, but not reported since early 1970s except in Iowa on soyabeans; Hall, 1991. Specific records from Colorado, Connecticut, Iowa, Idaho, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Wisconsin).

South America: Colombia, Venezuela.

Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria).

Europe: Present (Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia.

Biology and transmission

Seed transmitted externally or internally in Phaseolus vulgaris and possibly in Glycine max. The pathogen can survive from 5 to 24 years in seeds.

Seed is the most important means of survival and spread. The bacteria can overwinter on weeds or in crop debris in the field. In the field it has been known to survive in soil for at least two winters between bean crops rotated with wheat. There are no reports of vectors, but the nematode Meloidogyne incognita may assist entry by providing wounds.

C. flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens can infect in the absence of rain; it has not been observed to enter via stomata. Once within the plant, the bacterium colonizes the vascular tissue.

Detection/indexing method

  • At CIAT: Agar plate dilution technique. NBY (Nutrient Broth Yeast extract) semiselective culture medium and serology.

Treatment/control

  • Procedure followed at the centers in case of positive test

References of protocols at EPPO, NAPPO or other similar organization

OEPP/EPPO (1982) Data sheets on quarantine organisms No. 48, Corynebacterium flaccumfaciens. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 12 (1).

References and further reading

Frison EA, Bos L, Hamilton RI, Mathur SB, Taylor JD. (eds.). 1990. FAO/IBPGR Technical Guidelines for the Safe Movement of Legume Germplasm. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome/International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Hedges F. (1926) Bacterial wilt of beans (Bacterium flaccumfaciens Hedges), including comparisons with Bacterium phaseoli. Phytopathology 16, 1-22.

Torres GC, Lenné JM, Victoria JI. Bacterial wilt of Zornia spp. caused by Corynebacterium flaccumfaciens. Conference paper Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 1982 pp. 74-79. 

Back to top

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
terms and condition.
  • No comments found

International Agricultural Research Centres who worked together to make this site possible:
Africa Rice Center | Bioversity International | CIAT | CIMMYT | CIP | ICARDA | ICRISAT | IFPRI | IITA | ILRI | IRRI |