Crop Genebank Knowledge Base

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Maize

Field bank for maize genetic resources

Contributors to this page: CIMMYT, Mexico (Suketoshi Taba, Bonnie J. Furman), with inputs also received from IITA, Nigeria (Dominique Dumet), EMBRAPA (maize and sorghum genebank), Brazil (Flavia Teixeira), USDA(ARS/NC7, ISU), USA (Mark Millard).

When are field banks used

Field banks are usually used when species do not seed propagate, are difficult to establish or have short-lived seeds, and thus where the efforts and costs of constant regeneration of seeds are high, and it becomes more economical, efficient and practical to maintain them permanently in a field genebank.

CIMMYT is currently experimenting the use of field banks for Tripsacum spp., a maize wild relative. There is limited work being done with this wild species, but the most important procedures are mentioned below.

  • Clones are maintained planted in fields, at an experimental station mostly used for seed harvesting (the breeding station in Tlaltizapan, Morelos, Mexico). This is complementary to the ex situ seed genebank.
  • Clones are cut and cleaned once a year (no special handling is required).
  • Tripsacum will not cross breed with maize, so there is no need for isolation.
  • Diploid species can produce hybrid caryopsis (seeds) when flower at the same time. Therefore it is necessary to clean seedling volunteers around the clones, to avoid mixing them with the original clones.
  • Genotyping the clones should facilitate identification of diploid or apomixic polyploids (endosperm development does require fertilization by a reduced or unreduced sperm cell).
  • Currently, viable seeds are harvested and distributed upon request with small amount of seed.
  • The major problem has been adaptation to the ex situ sites. Many clones not adapted to the CIMMYT experimental station environment and have been lost.

A low level of sexual reproduction allows for gene flow among diploid and polyploid species, creating the complex pattern of overlapping and highly variable morphology seen in the centers of species diversity in Mexico and Guatemala. In situ monitoring of the species has been carried out in Mexico and Guatemala in the last few years. Contraction of populations at in situ sites of Tripsacum is noted, especially in Guatemala. An ex situ field genebank of Tripsacum can complement in situ conservation. Research on Tripsacum diversity and maize-Tripsacum hybrids can contribute in maize evolution and breeding, and thus the use of Tripsacum in agriculture.
 

References and further reading

Berthaud J, Savidan Y, Barre M, Leblanc O. 1997. Tripsacum In: Fucillo D, Sears L, Stapleton P, editors. Biodiversity in Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Duvick SA, Pollak LM, Edwards JW, White PJ. 2006. Altering the fatty acid composition of Corn Belt corn through Tripsacum introgression. Maydica 51:409-416.

Springer TL, Dewald CL. 2004. Eastern gamagrass and other Tripsacum species. In: Moser LE, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE, editors. Warm-Season (C4) Grasses Agronomy Monograph 45. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 955-973.

Wilkes G. 2004. Corn, strange and marvelous: but is a definitive origin known? In: Smith CW, Betran J, Runge ECA, editors. Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 3-64.
 

Seed bank for maize genetic resources

Contributors to this page: CIMMYT, Mexico (Suketoshi Taba), with inputs also received from IITA, Nigeria (Dominique Dumet), EMBRAPA (maize and sorghum genebank), Brazil (Flavia Teixeira), USDA (ARS/NC7, ISU), USA (Mark Millard).

Inside the USDA maize seedbank in Ames, USA
(photo: M. Mackay)

Conservation of maize germplasm

There are more than 135 000 samples of maize seeds conserved in seed banks worldwide. Most cultivated accessions and a wild relative - teosinte are conserved in seed banks.

 

 

 

 

References and further reading

Chang TT. 1985. Preservation of crop germplasm. Iowa State Journal of Research. Vol. 59. No.4. pp. 365-378.

FAO/IPGRI. 1994. Genebank standards. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. Available in English, Spanish, French and Arabic.

Global Crop Diversity Trust. 2007. Global strategy for the ex situ conservation and utilization of maize germplasm [online]. Available for download from: http://www.croptrust.org/content/maize. Date accessed: 21 March 2013.

Justice OL, Bass LN. 1978. Principles and practices of seed storage. Agriculture handbook no. 506. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

Probert RJ, Hay FR. 2000. Keeping seeds alive. In: Black M, Bewley JD, editors. Seed technology and its biological basis. CRC Press LLC. USA and Canada. pp. 375-404.

Taba S, Ginkel M, Hoisington D, Poland D. 2004. Wellhausen-Anderson Plant Genetic Resources Center: Operations manual, 2004. El Batan, Mexico: CIMMYT. Available here.

Safety duplication of maize genetic resources

Contributors to this page: CIMMYT, Mexico (Suketoshi Taba, Bonnie J. Furman), with inputs also received from IITA, Nigeria (Dominique Dumet), EMBRAPA (maize and sorghum genebank), Brazil (Flavia Teixeira), USDA (ARS/NC7, ISU), USA (Mark Millard).

When should it be used

  • Always. A safety backup should be kept of all unique accessions under ideal conditions. See also the general page on safety duplication procedures.
  • If possible, every genebank should have a base collection for long-term backup on site.
  • Black-box safety duplication should be used by crop genetic resource conservation networks, in a genebank of choice.
  • A secondary “ultimate” backup at the Svalbard Global Seed Bank is ideal.
  • In some cases, it is beneficial to have germplasm incorporated into the active collection of a sister genebank. In the case of integration of the safety duplicates, the recipient genebank will need to register the accessions.

A research assistant for CIMMYT’s wheat germplasm
collection prepares a shipment of seeds from CIMMYT
to be sent to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault (photo: CIMMYT)

Minimum sample size

  • A regeneration set of at least 512 seeds of each accession should be sent to the designated or collaborating genebank as black-box safety duplicates.
  • See also recommendations from the general page on safety duplication procedures of this site.

Viability for storage

  • Seed viability above 85% is preferred.
  • See also recommendations from the general page on safety duplication procedures of this site.

Moisture content

  • Seed moisture content should be 6-8%.
  • See also recommendations from the general page on safety duplication procedures of this site.

Container specifications

To ensure both seed viability in the genebank and accession safety en route to the users.

Seed packaging method

  • One or two aluminum foil pouches should be packaged with the dried seeds as mentioned above for the base collection.
  • For the black-box, several pouches of the seed samples should be included in a cardboard or plastic box that can be placed in the racks of the designated or collaborating genebank.

Specifications of packaging material

  • Side-gusseted stand-up pouches of aluminum foil (custom-made) for about 1 kg maize seeds [size 3.5”x 10.5” x 1.25” (expands to 2.5”)].
  • An example of the aluminum foil pouches is supplied by KAPAK Corporation, 5303 Parkdale Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55416-1681, USA.

Storage specifications

Assigning location codes

To facilitate the access to the seed accessions stored in the genebank.

  • The seed accessions should be stored in an orderly way.
    • The row, column, level, and box (sample within box) in the storage racks should be identified by two digit numbers.
    • A prefix can be assigned to denote row, column, level, box and sample numbers.

Each bag has a label containing all the necessary information about its contents (photo: CIMMYT)

Storage conditions

To ensure longevity of the seed viability.

  • As stated in the genebank standards (FAO/IPGRI 1994), storage at less than -18oC is preferred.

Shipping method

  • Prepare the documentation of outgoing seed shipments with phytosanitary certificate, an import permit and others, as needed.
  • Follow the same procedures for the seed shipments from the genebank.
  • Boxes should be shipped using the most reliable, quickest and most cost effective route and carrier possible.
  • Avoid shipments during hot times of the year.

Legal arrangements

  • A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or the Germplasm Acquisition Agreement (GAA) with the collaborating genebanks and institutions will be needed.
  • See also recommendations from the general page on safety duplication procedures of this site.

Recording information during safety duplication

The following information must be recorded for each consignment:

  • Accession number (number).
  • Collection name, pedigree (name and number).
  • Associate number (if germplasm is held in another genebank, include that genebank’s accession numbers).
  • Collection site (country of origin, state name, longitude, latitude, altitude).
  • Donor (donor institution).
  • Race class (maize race, race purity, common name).
  • Grain type (texture, colour).
  • Origin of the stored seeds (location, year, field plot, sample).
  • Photo [sample photo of ear and/or kernels (grain type: colours and textures)].
  • Reference sample (location in the bank, seed origin).
  • Seed exchange policy (MLS, specific).
  • Seed health (specify if cleared for outgoing, or if not cleared).
  • Seed shipment (collaborator, institution, country).
  • Safety duplicate storage (collaborating genebanks).
  • Seed monitoring (seed amounts and seed viability).
  • Accession availability status (available, not available).
  • Storage address (row-column-level-sample).
  • Amount of seed stored (seed number or seed weight).

References and further reading

FAO/IPGRI. 1994. Genebank standards. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. Available in English, Spanish, French and Arabic .

Pardey PG, Koo B, Wright BD, Van Dusen ME, Skovmand B, Taba S. 2001. Costing the conservation of genetic resources: CIMMYT’s ex situ maize and wheat collection. Crop Science 41(4):1286-1299. Available from : http://sgrp.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Pardey-2001.pdf. Accessed: 15 September 2010. 

Regeneration guidelines for maize

View regeneration guidelines in full (in PDF)
by clicking on the picture above (0.3MB)

Also available in the following languages:
Arabic - French - Portuguese - Russian - Spanish

The information on this page was extracted from:
Taba S. and Twumasi-Afriyie S. 2008. Regeneration guidelines: maize. In: Dulloo M.E., Thormann I., Jorge M.A. and Hanson J., editors. Crop specific regeneration guidelines [CD-ROM]. CGIAR System-wide Genetic Resource Programme, Rome, Italy. 10 pp.


Before reading the regeneration details for this crop, read the general introduction that gives general guidelines to follow by clicking here.

Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays) is an outcrossing, monoecious annual crop that evolved in southern Mexico, possibly from the close relative teosinte. The seed bearing ears are borne laterally at the mid-nodes of the plan, while the male flowers (tassel) are on top of the plant. There are more than 250 races and local cultivars of maize in Latin America. Some of the mid-altitude races in Latin America have growing seasons of more than 10 months while some early maturing races take less than 3 months from planting to harvest. Some races are 4–5 metres tall, making artificial pollination difficult. Traditionally, maize breeders classified maize ecotypes by their adaptation to growing environments: tropical (<1200 m), mid-altitude (1200–1900 m) and highland (1900–2600 m) for those growing between 26° north and 26° south; and temperate for those cultivars growing in latitudes above 26° north and below 26° south.

Maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays)

The diverse phenotypes and widely differing adaptations of the races of maize and local cultivars are often constraints to regeneration. The germplasm accessions are either genetically heterozygous (panmictic populations) or homozygous (inbreds). The recommended practices and procedures for maize germplasm regeneration are compiled from experience and consultation of theoretical studies on sample size and mating system.

Choice of environment and planting season

Climatic conditions

  • If possible, choose an environment corresponding to the original collection site conditions.
  • Under rainfed conditions, 500–700mm of rainfall is considered optimal (depending on the germplasm accessions and soil texture); at lower rainfall supplementary irrigation is needed.
  • Temperate maize germplasm is adapted to long-day conditions of =13.4 hours of light. Tropical maize usually needs shorter day lengths for floral initiation in temperate latitudes.
  • Regenerating maize landraces adapted to cool environments with growing seasons of >10 months, such as those found in the Andean mid-highlands, Central American mid-highlands and southern Mexico, will require collaboration with national genebanks.
  • Maize can grow in a temperature range of 5–45 °C, but generally does best at 25–35 °C. Extreme high temperatures, especially combined with low humidity, may reduce pollen viability and cause poor seed set.

Preparation for regeneration

When to regenerate

  • When the number of viable seeds per accession is <1500 in active or base collections of panmictic populations and <250 seeds in inbred lines.
  • When seed viability falls below 85% of the initial germination percentage in active collections, determined by viability monitoring (see FAO/IPGRI 1994 and ISTA 2008 for more details).

Pre-treatments

  • It is recommended to apply fungicide and insecticide to seeds to help protect seedling emergence and growth in the field.

Precautions

  • For panmictic populations, maintain an equal and large effective population size (>100 ears or more than four times the initial sample size, whichever is smaller) throughout regeneration cycles, to avoid genetic drift, inbreeding, and subsequent loss of alleles (Crossa 1989; Crossa et al. 1994; Wang et al. 2004).
  • Inspect and screen seed-producing plants for pests and disease under quarantine regulations, before and after regeneration to provide quality seeds for seed exchange and use (Mezzalama et al. 2001).
  • Take extra precautions if there is a risk of GMO contamination. Screen seed lots for the presence of GMOs after regeneration and eliminate contaminated lots (Mezzalama et al. 2001).

Method of regeneration

Regenerate maize using controlled pollination.

Artificial pollination

This method is the most commonly used for germplasm accession regeneration and multiplication. It can be done either by plant-to-plant or chain crossing. Chain crossing is recommended for regenerating large numbers of accessions.

  • Plant-to-plant cross (dioecious mode) — uses each plant either as male or female. It requires twice as much land as chain crosses to produce the same number of ears and doubles the effective population size (if 100 ears are harvested, the effective population is 200).
  • Chain cross (monoecious mode) — uses each plant as a male and female.
  • Good synchronization between silking and tasseling is needed.
  • Carry out pollination before the temperature reaches 36°C.

Natural or open pollination

  • Natural pollination (i.e. open pollinated mode of seed fertilization) may be used if regeneration is carried out on-farm based on a contract with farmers who cultivate local maize races specially adapted to on-farm growing conditions. Under these circumstances, use isolated plots in the farmer’s fields.
  • Collect a large seed sample (3–5 kg) for the active and base storage banks from the open-pollinated regeneration field plots.

Prevention of GMO contamination

  • When carrying out artificial pollination, prevent GMO contamination by pollen migration from outside the regeneration plot. Cover silks with air-tight, glassine envelopes and tassels with pollen bags, followed by swift and accurate pollination.
  • Plant sentinel border plants (well adapted materials, hybrids or varieties) for detection of unintentional GMO contamination from outside and inside regeneration fields if any risk of contamination is expected. Such plants should be detasseled and open-pollinated by the mixtures of the pollen sources migrating into the regeneration plots. Test the bulked seeds from the sentinel rows for unintentional presence of GMOs (Mezzalama et al. 2001).

Floral induction

  • Under temperate conditions, shading of day-length-sensitive tropical maize germplasm accessions for 8 hours a day for 6–8 weeks after sowing prompts floral initiation, allowing limited numbers of such accessions to be pollinated and harvested (Mark Millard, pers. comm.). Use this technique for regenerating a few long-season germplasm accessions per year.

Planting layout, density and distance

 

 

This photograph shows the first stage of hand pollination. One ear is selected on each plant and the silk is covered with a glassine bag to prevent pollination from any foreign pollen. On a second trip through the field, pollen from the male tassel are collected and applied directly to the silk of the next plant's ear. This "chain crossing" is necessary to ensure that the highest level of genetic diversity is maintained in each accession (Photo: CIMMYT)

  • Lay out regeneration plots as a non-replicated experiment, separated from the breeding plots or production fields.
  • To the extent possible, group the accessions by maturity, plant height and pollination type (selfing or sibbing) in different blocks to facilitate field management and operations.
  • Alternate grain colours to facilitate detec tion of unwanted cross-pollination.
  • Adjust plot size and plant density with the germplasm accessions under regeneration. For example, to establish 256 plants per plot (60m2), with a harvest of more than 1002 ears (panmictic populations), use 16 rows, 5 m long, separated by 75 cm between the rows per accession. Plant two seeds per hill to establish 16 plants per row after thinning.
  • Proper density and plot size can be used according to the maturity and plant height of the accessions.
  • Plant inbred lines in 8–10 rows per accession (21 plants per 5-m-long row) to have 168 plants to produce enough seeds. Maintain purity of the lines by planting the same original seed parents (8–10 self-pollinated ears) in the subsequent regenerations instead of planting the bulked seeds of the previous regeneration. Harvest selfed ears, which have uniformity in plant, ear and grain type.
  • In the case of natural pollination, plant accessions 200–300 m apart, with more than 200 plants per accession in the field plots, to achieve 100 well-filled half-sib ears, (the effective population is 100), and harvest 100 ears from the centre of the plot to represent the accession.
  • If regeneration fails to produce 100 ears (or any other required number of seeds), carry out a second regeneration of the same accession, using the same seed origin. Combine the ears of the first and second regeneration to represent the regeneration cycle.

Crop management

Maize is generally grown under rainfed conditions but can also be grown under irrigation.

Irrigation

  • Apply supplementary irrigation during drought spells.
  • If regeneration is being done under irrigation, provide moisture stress 2 weeks before and after flowering as this is critical for good seed set and ear development.

Fertilization

  • Apply sufficient soil mineral nutrients for normal plant growth.
  • Apply recommended pre-emergence applications of N-P-K and then N at the time of cultivation.
  • In the tropics, a minimum fertilizer application of 80-40-0 of N-P-K is often used in on-farm trials.

Common pests and diseases

Contact plant health experts to identify the symptoms of the likely pests and diseases and the appropriate control measures. The following are common pests and diseases for maize:

  • Root worms, cutworm, thrips, Dalbulus maidis , Cicadulina spp., Spodoptera frugiperda , and other insects attack roots, leaves and stalks in tropical regions (Ortega 1987).
  • Diseases affecting leaves, stalk and kernels are downy mildews, maize rusts, Turcicum and Maydis leaf blights, gray leaf spot, Pythium stalk rot, Fusarium and Gibberella stalk rots, Stenocarpella ( syn . Diplodia maydis) stalk rot, anthracnose (Collectotrichum graminicola) stalk rot, Penicillium ear rots, Aspergillus ear rots, Fusarium and Gibberella ear rots, Cephalosporium kernel rot, Stenocarpella ear rot, common smut (Ustilago maydis), maize dwarf mosaic virus, maize streak virus, maize fine stripe virus, maize bushy stunt and corn stunt (The CIMMYT Maize Program 2004).

Pest and disease control

Consult a plant health expert for guidance.

  • Reduce insect damage by the timely application of the correc t insecticide. However, leaf and stalk diseases and ear rots are difficult to control.
  • Be aware of local pest and disease incidence in each region and avoid hot spots of damaging pests and diseases.
  • Excessive moisture and drought stress aggravate the problem.
  • Coordinate periodic field inspection by pathologists and virologists during the growing season.

Roguing off-types

  • Roguing of off-types within the accession is carried out in the regeneration plots at seedling and flowering stages as seed accessions may be contaminated with other genotypes or accessions from the previous regeneration or from pollen contamination at the time of pollination.

Others

  • Avoid contamination from foreign pollen, including transgenes.
  • Follow rotational practices that are appropriate for the cropping systems of the area.

Harvesting

1. Before harvest, record all relevant agronomic traits (see ‘documentation’ below).

2. Immediately before harvest, record the number of plants lodged and number of plants pollinated.

3. At harvest, the black layer of the seed is formed and most leaves, especially husk leaves, have dried. Remove the pollinated ears from the plant and place the ear either under the plant or in front of the row for inspection (photos 5 a, b).

Harvested ears for inspection in the field (photos: CIMMYT)

4. Further inspect the ears individually and remove diseased, contaminated or abnormal kernels on the cob before and after shelling.

5. Include clean ears with good grain quality to represent the regeneration cycle and record the number of ears forming the seed accession in the regeneration field book.

6. Treat the harvested ears with insecticide to protect them from insect damage during seed processing.

Number of seeds harvested per pollinated ear

  • Collect 10 seeds from 100 maternal plants or 50 seeds from 20 maternal plants or take an equal number of seeds from the largest possible number of maternal plants to maintain a high effective population size ( N ) (Crossa et al. 1994; Vencovsky and Crossa1999).

Post-harvest management

1. Pre-dry harvested ears in a chamber with heated air (not more than 35°C) blown through the piles of ears to reduce the seed moisture to about 13–15%. If the maize is quite damp at harvest, keep drying temperatures below 30°C. Where special drying facilities are not available, dry ears in the shade with good air circulation.

2. Shell the ears to the individual seed envelope and balance seed samples prepared from all ears to represent the regeneration cycle, normally by taking the same number of kernels per ear. Further cool-dry the seed bulks of the accessions. It is ideal to make several regeneration packets of two seeds each from the individual ears (for long-term preservation) for subsequent regeneration cycles (Crossa 1989).

3. Perform secondary seed drying by placing the seed in cloth or paper bags and putting these in a cool dry room at low temperature and humidity (10–15°C and 15–20% relative humidity) for at least 4 weeks, until seed moisture reaches 6–8% in equilibrium. This is normally done using special driers which combine cooling and dehumidifying functions. If such equipment is not available, dry seeds to a moisture content of 7–8% with silica gel or another appropriate desiccant.

4. Prepare several sets of the balanced bulks for preservation in active, base and safety duplicate collections. Send a sample of each accession to a seed health laboratory for quarantine requirements.

5. Register seed test weight (1000 seed weight) and germination percentage before storage.

6. Record other regeneration data (see documentation below) into the genebank management system. Check the original passport data to see if the seed characteristics are the same as described in the original records in order to replace, if necessary (see 8 below) the old seeds with the regenerated seeds.

7. Store seed samples at the respective storage locations according to genebank norms (active, base and safety backup collections).

8. Replace old seeds in the active and/or base collections with new regenerated seeds to facilitate management and save space. A small sample of original seed may need to be kept as reference material.

Monitoring accession identity

  • Confirm the regenerated seed accession by characterization data on kernel colour and texture for the accession identity.
  • At harvest, recheck the seed colour and texture, ear and grain types, maturity and race classification against the original records (recorded during the original introductions)of the accession from the genebank passport database. The plant type can be used to monitor the accession identity, but it may not be stable across the regeneration cycles, especially in different regeneration/collection environments. Race classification can be reconfirmed by plant phenotype and the ear and kernel characteristics.
  • After shelling ears and during seed processing, check the seed lot against permanent reference original samples of the accession. Attach labels with the genebank accession identification number and the field plot number of the accession inside and outside the seed envelope and cloth bags.

Documentation of information during regeneration

A field book of the regeneration nursery is recommended to document identification, characterization, seed origin, number of plants pollinated and harvested and agronomic traits of the accession and introduction. The field book can contain the following detailed information:

  • Regeneration site name and map/GPS reference
  • Name of collaborator
  • Field/plot/nursery/greenhouse reference number
  • Accession number; population identification
  • Source of seed
  • Data, location and plot number of previous regeneration site
  • Sowing date and density
  • Field layout used
  • Field management details (irrigation, fertilizer, control of weeds, pests, and diseases, and others)
  • Environmental conditions of regeneration site (altitude, day length, temperature, precipitation, soil type, others)
  • Emergence in the field or screenhouse (number of plants germinated)
  • Number of plants established
  • Days from sowing to silking and tassling (male flower)
  • Pollination control method used: plant to plant, chain cross, open pollinated
  • Number of plants pollinated
  • Harvest date
  • Number of plants (pollinated ears or ears) harvested
  • Field weight of the harvested ears
  • Seed moisture percentage at harvest
  • Agronomic performance rating of the accession by considering field weight, seed quality, uniformity and standability
  • Agro-morphological plant and ear traits (ear length, ear diameter, kernel row number, kernel length, kernel width, kernel thickness, plant height, ear height, number of leaves above ear leaf, days to silking, days to male flowering, ear rot rating) are recorded for characterization data and are used for multivariate analysis for grouping the accessions (Franco et al. 2005)
  • Approval or repeat of the regeneration based on the effective population size and/or possible inconsistency of the seed accession with passport data and reference seed samples
  • Photo of ears and kernels
  • Date of seed storage
  • Initial germination percentage of stored seeds
  • Seed moisture percentage at seed storage
  • Documentation of quarantine clearance by seed health unit

References and further reading

Bioversity International, CIMMYT. 2009. Key access and utilization descriptors for maize genetic resources. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico. Available here.

CIMMYT Maize Program. 2004. Maize diseases: A guide for field identification. 4th edition. CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico.

Crossa J. 1989. Methodologies for estimating the sample size required for genetic conservation of outbreeding crops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77:153–161.

Crossa J, Taba S, Eberhart SA, Bretting P, Vencovsky R. 1994. Prac tical considerations for maintaining germplasm in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89:89–95.

FAO/IPGRI. 1994. Genebank standards. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. Available in English, Spanish, French and Arabic.

Franco J, Crossa J, Taba S, Shands H. 2005. A sampling strategy for conserving genetic diversity when forming core subsets. Crop Science 45:1035–1044.

Hartkamp AD, White JW, Rodriguez Aguilar A, Banzinger M, Srinivasan G, Granados G, Crossa J. 2000. Maize production environments revisited: A GIS-based approach. CIMMY T, Mexico City, Mexico.

ISTA. 2008. International Rules for Seed Testing. International Seed Testing Association. ISTA Secretariat, Switzerland.

Lafitte HR. 1994. Identifying production problems in tropical maize: A field guide. CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico.

Mezzalama M, Gilchrist L, McNab A. 2005. Seed Health: Rules and regulations for the safe movement of germplasm. Mexico. D.F., CIMMYT. Available from: URL: http://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/download/cim/93586.pdf. Date accessed: 3 September 2010.

Ortega AC. 1987. Insect pests of maize. A guide for field identification. CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico.

Pardey PG, Koo B, Van Dusen E, Skovemand B, Taba S, Wright BD. 2004. CIMMY T genebank. In: Saving Seeds: The economics of conserving crop genetic resources ex situ in the Future Harvest centers of the CGIAR. CABI Publishing, UK . pp. 21–47.

Salhuana W. 1995. Conservation, evaluation and use of maize genetic resources. In: Engels JMM, Rao RR, editors. Regeneration of Seed Crops and Their Wild Relatives. ICRISAT, India. 

Vencovsky R, Crossa J. 1999. Variance effective population size under mixed self and random mating with applications to genetic conservation of species. Crop Science 39:1282–1294.

Wang J, Crossa J, van Ginkel M, Taba S. 2004. Statistical genetics and simulation models in genetic resource conservation and regeneration. Crop Science 44:2246–2253.

Acknowledgement

These guidelines have been peer reviewed by Jose Crossa, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico; Major Goodmann, USA; and Zachary K. Muthamia, National Genebank of Kenya (NGK ), Kenya.

Conservation of maize genetic resources

Contributors to this page: CIMMYT, Mexico (Suketoshi Taba, Bonnie J. Furman), with inputs also received from IITA, Nigeria (Dominique Dumet), EMBRAPA (maize and sorghum genebank), Brazil (Flavia Teixeira), USDA(ARS/NC7, ISU), USA (Mark Millard).

Importance of maize conservation

Conservation of maize means
also preserving its great diversity
(photo: CIMMYT)

The variability amongst maize landraces exceeds the variability in any other crop species. Maize genetic resources constitute an immeasurable treasure for humankind. Their conservation and the investigation of existing variation and possible current and future uses provide:

  • Resources for agricultural improvement to reduce hunger and poverty.
  • A solid knowledge base for future generations of researchers and technological users.

Maize ex situ germplasm collections include landraces (maize races), improved populations (synthetics and varieties, cycles of selection), inbreds (early generation lines and homozygous lines), reference hybrids and genetic stocks (natural genes and transgenes) and wild species (caryopses and clones).

  • Genebanks should have a clear policy on what types of maize germplasm, as well as the extent of the existing diversity (global, regional, and national), should be conserved.

The value of germplasm within genebanks is mostly measured by the extent of utilization of their genetic variation (mostly for breeding programmes). Landraces have the value of adaptation to specific cultivated regions or ecological conditions. Wild species may contain special genes such as those conferring disease resistance, climate adaptation, or nutritional quality.

Commercial maize breeding has exploited only an elite fraction (5-10%) of the more than 300 landraces estimated to exist in the New World (the center of origin and where most of the diversity still exists). Some races of maize have been displaced by modern cultivars while others are threatened as a result of modern farming and ranching practices. While local maize landraces can still be found in areas where Native Americans predominate, economic forces are often eroding the well-being of many small farmers, resulting in a reduction of the land area devoted to most landraces.

Inside CIMMYT's genebank (photo: CIMMYT)

15usda

Maize diversity at the USDA genebank (photo: L. Guarino, by kind permission of USDA genebank in Ames, Iowa, USA)

Germplasm collection and conservation

The first extensive ex situ maize germplasm collection is documented in a booklet resulting from a collecting mission of maize races in Mexico (Wellhausen et al.,1952) and later in additional booklets from collecting missions in Central America, the Caribbean and South America (Goodman and Brown, 1988). The majority of maize germplasm from Latin America is conserved in the ex situ germplasm collections at CIMMYT, the USDA and national genebanks, through coordinated efforts over the last 50-60 years. Similarly, from the 1970s onwards, more international and national efforts to preserve maize germplasm in the Americas and other continents have been conducted. Landraces and enhanced germplasm are the main objective of ex situ conservation by national and international maize genebanks. A recent survey of ex situ collections and their holdings is summarized in the strategy for ex situ conservation and utilization of maize germplasm (Global Crop Diversity Trust, 2007).

Additionally, where in situ maize diversity is being cultivated, ex situ genebanks, such as those of Latin American countries, support and back up in situ maize races in production and evolution in partnership with the local breeding and development institutions and farmers. Ex situ genebank activity is complementary to in situ conservation. The future maize genetic diversity and maize evolution through gene pools that the farmers and the breeders manage, are supported by the conservation activities of ex situ maize genebanks (Taba et al. 2004).

Major maize collections

The total number of unique New World germplasm accessions has been estimated at more than 27,000 (excluding breeding materials). The active collections in Latin America are being conserved in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, CIMMYT, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Paraguay and Venezuela. Important individual collections are also being conserved or duplicated in the USA (NCGRP – Ft. Collins; NCRPIS – Ames, Iowa).

The estimated number of accessions in the Old World collections varies between 20 000 and 40 000 (depending on whether breeding materials are included and assuming many could be duplicates). Most of these accessions probably represent descendants of widely-distributed, open pollinated varieties or hybrids from New World accessions after the voyage of Columbus (Brandolini, 1970; Taba, 1997a).

In addition to major germplasm collections, there is also the Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center at the University of Illinois (USA), in which various identified genes in maize are preserved in a specific genetic background (Global Crop Diversity Trust, 2007).

 

References and further reading

Brandolini A. 1970. Maize. In: Frankel OH, Bennett E, editors. Genetic Resources in Plants: Their Exploration and Conservation. F.A. Davis Co., Philadelphia. pp. 273-309.

Chang TT. 1985. Preservation of crop germplasm. Iowa State Journal of Research. Vol. 59. No.4. pp. 365-378.

CIMMYT. 2006. Maize Germplasm Networking Meeting. Global Maize Genetic Resources Conservation: A Workshop on Conservation, Management, and Networking. 2-5 May 2006, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico D.F.: CIMMYT.

Ellis RH. 1998. Longevity of seeds stored hermetically at low moisture contents. Seed Science Research supplement 1:9-10.

Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH. 1985. Handbook of seed technology for genebanks volume I. Principles and Methodology. Handbooks for Genebanks no. 2. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

FAO/IPGRI. 1994. Genebank standards. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. Available in English, Spanish, French and Arabic.

Global Crop Diversity Trust. 2007. Global strategy for the ex situ conservation and utilization of maize germplasm [online]. Available for download from: http://www.croptrust.org/content/maize. Date accessed: 21 March 2013.

Goodman MM, Brown WL. 1988. Races of corn. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW, editors. Corn and corn improvement, third edition, monograph 18. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc. pp. 33-79.

Gomez-Campo C. 2006. Erosion of genetic resources within seed genebanks: The role of seed containers. Seed Science Research 16:291-294.

Hanson J. 1985. Procedures for handling seeds in genebanks. Practical manuals for genebanks no. 1. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Hong TD, Ellis RH. 1996. A protocol to determine seed storage behavior. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Rome. Italy. Available here.

IBPGR. 1991. Descriptors for maize. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico City/International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome. Available here.

International Seed Testing Association. 1993. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 21, Supplement.

James C. 2007. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief Vol. 37. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

Jaramillo S, Baena M. 2000. Material de apoyo a la capacitación en conservación ex situ de recursos fitogeneticos. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogeneticos, Cali, Colombia.

Justice OL, Bass LN. 1978. Principles and practices of seed storage. Agriculture handbook no. 506. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

Mezzalama M, Gilchrist L, McNab A. 2005. Seed Health: Rules and regulations for the safe movement of germplasm. Mexico. D.F., CIMMYT. Available from: http://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/download/cim/93586.pdf. Date accessed: 3 September 2010.

Pardey PG, Koo B, Wright BD, Van Dusen ME, Skovmand B, Taba S. 2001. Costing the conservation of genetic resources: CIMMYT’s ex situ maize and wheat collection. Crop Science 41(4):1286-1299. Available from : http://sgrp.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Pardey-2001.pdf. Accessed: 15 September 2010.

Probert RJ, Hay FR. 2000. Keeping seeds alive. In: Black M, Bewley JD, editors. Seed technology and its biological basis. CRC Press LLC. USA and Canada. pp. 375-404.

Taba S, editor. 2005. Latin American Maize Germplasm Conservation: Regeneration, In situ Conservation, Core Collection, and Prebreeding: Proceedings of a Workshop held at CIMMYT. April 7-10, 2003. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.

Taba S. 1997a. Maize. In: Fuccillo D, Sears L, Stapleton P, editors. Biodiversity in Trust, conservation and use of plant genetic resources in CGIAR Centers. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 213-226.

Taba S, editor. 1997b. Latin American Maize Germplasm Regeneration and Conservation: Proceedings of a Workshop held at CIMMYT, June 1-6, 1996. Maize Program Special Report. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.

Taba S, Eberhart SA, Pollak LM. 2004. Germplasm resources. In Smith CW, Betran J, Range ECA (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pp.99-132.

Walters C, Wheeler LM, Grotenhuis JM. 2005. Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Science Research 15:1-20.

Warham EJ, Butler LD, Sutton BC. 1996. Seed testing of maize and wheat: A laboratory guide. CIMMYT, Mexico and CAB International, UK.

Wellhausen E, Roberts J, Roberts LM, Hernandez E. 1952. Races of Maize in Mexico: Their Origin, Characteristics, and Distribution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Subcategories

International Agricultural Research Centres who worked together to make this site possible:
Africa Rice Center | Bioversity International | CIAT | CIMMYT | CIP | ICARDA | ICRISAT | IFPRI | IITA | ILRI | IRRI |

You are here: